Did Covid bioweapons research start in 1965?
In a Earth shaking talk at the EU parliament, Dr. David E. Martin revealed disturbing facts from patent applications on corona virus gain of function and vaccine research WAY before covid-19.
In a Earth shaking talk at the EU parliament, Dr. David E. Martin revealed disturbing facts from patent applications on corona virus gain of function and vaccine research WAY before covid-19 was “discovered” at the end of 2019. Some dating back to 1965.
Video (21 mins) at:
https://twitter.com/kimdotcom/status/1661698114917646336
Well worth the time watching.
Key points from that video above
Corona virus bio weapon research start in 1965
Pfizer had a spike protein vaccine for this in 1990. With patent that proves it. The covid spike protein was NOT new in 2019.
And they KNEW since then that the corona vaccines never worked due to rapid corona virus mutation. Thousands of scientific papers support this data.
2002 University NC Chapel Hill made a corona bioweapon that could target certain racial groups under NIH funded and patented. SAR 1.0 appear in the world just 1 year later...
2003 CDC broke the internal bio weapons treaty by downloading Chinese corona virus. Then they patented. They had to override the patent examiner who complained.
2005 the US govt classified this research as bio warfare and terrorism. They KNEW. Then they continued to fund gain of function research via NIH and black funding from the dark state.
2016 National Academy of Sciences conference talked about a deliberate or accidental corona bio weapon release. NOT from a bat in a wet market!
And that hyping this info would make getting investors for virus easier and profits for vax companies higher.
Early 2019 (before official covid news at end 2019) Moderna modified 4 vax patents to include the phrase "for accidental or deliberate release" for a virus that officially "did not exist". To justify making the vax.
Wow.
The Deep State, world govts, CIA, FBI, social media, MSM, NIH, CDC, WHO all have some big explaining to do here. I would suggest Nuremburg 2.0 internalization war crimes trial as a good location for them to try to explain what they did. And take the just consequences if found guilty.