Is it science or politics?
Did Dr Fauci and top scientists conspire to cover up and shame the Wuhan lab leak theory?
I thought science was a quest for the truth, not using lies for political expediency and harmony with China.
New unredacted emails between Dr Fauci and other top virus scientists were not interested in the mostly likely truth about the covid origina (lab leak theory). Instead their conspired to cover it up and discredit other sciencists who talked about it.
That is not science in my view. It is dirty politics.
“Trust the science” (TM) they say in their propaganda. Fauce has even said that he should be beyond critism, because “I am science”. It was all lies. And King Fauci was not wearing the clothes of respectable science. But instead was naked of the truth. We all behaved as thought he had wonderful science clothes on. But once the truth is reveals you can not unsee his naked body paraded before the crowds.
Leading British and US scientists thought it was likely that Covid accidentally leaked from a laboratory but were concerned that further debate would harm science in China, emails show.
An email from Sir Jeremy Farrar, director of the Wellcome Trust, on February 2 2020 said that “a likely explanation” was that Covid had rapidly evolved from a Sars-like virus inside human tissue in a low-security lab.
The email, to Dr Anthony Fauci and Dr Francis Collins of the US National Institutes of Health, went on to say that such evolution may have “accidentally created a virus primed for rapid transmission between humans”.
But a leading scientist told Sir Jeremy that “further debate would do unnecessary harm to science in general and science in China in particular”. Dr Collins, the former director of the US National Institutes of Health, warned it could damage “international harmony”.
…
Viscount Ridley, co-author of Viral: the search for the origin of Covid, said: “These emails show a lamentable lack of openness and transparency among Western scientists who appear to have been more interested in shutting down a hypothesis they thought was very plausible, for political reasons.”
from today’s Telegraph news article on the cover up
Neither :) It's fraud anyway we look