Was 1/6 an FBI run event?

Ray Epps and several other 1/6 agitators, removed the Capitol fence ahead of the protestors, then bullhorned them to enter the Capitol. None of them have been indicted by DOJ. FBI ignores them.

Interesting details on Ray Epps part in organizing 1/6 Capitol entry. He, and others he worked with, have never been indicted by DOJ. Moreover they seem to have been working for the FBI to create the 1/6 event.

They broke and totally removed from the area of the breach, all the fencing marking the Capitol boundary. And encouraged peaceful protestors to enter the Capitol.

Unfortunately while Epps and his other FBI hired agitators, remain uncharged, hundreds of the other protestors have been sitting in DC jail in terrible conditions for over 8 months. And the few who have been trialed, received long sentences, for mostly misdemeanors such as trespass.

Here is one of of the other agitators who has never been indicted, or even put on the FBI 1/6 wanted list:

Neither has this guy. Who for 90 minutes used his bullhorn to command protestors to first enter the Capitol grounds, then to enter the Capitol building.

He was perched above the crowd near the breach in the fence created by his buddy and seems to have coordinated his actions with Ray Epps on the ground.

“For nearly 90 minutes straight, he bombards the otherwise leaderless crowd below him with endless variations on a single instruction: “Don’t just stand there. Keep moving forward!”"

“But once the crowd had continuously “moved forward” for over an hour, and the very first handful of rioters entered the building, ScaffoldCommander suddenly threw the switch: “Okay we’re in! We’re in! Come on! We gotta fill up the Capitol! Come on! Come now! We need help We gotta fill up the Capitol! They got in.””

"one can only imagine what would happen to The Narrative if “the very first insurrectionist to illegally invade the hallowed Capitol grounds” was just an undercover Fed with foreknowledge.

...

[1/6 attorneys] : If 'ScaffoldCommander' is a Fed, and your client was induced to “move forward” and be thrust into a breaching throng, you have an entrapment case. “Fill up the Capitol” is a direct order. That goes far beyond the “strong suggestive language” that government informants are required to stay within in order to avoid entrapment."

Quotes and images from this very detailed investigation by Revolver News https://www.revolver.news/2021/12/damning-new-details-massive-web-unindicted-operators-january-6/

Summary

1. Despite numerous advance warnings of potential trouble, security was remarkably light (some might say suspiciously so!) for such a massive crowd. (The original breach of the outer security fence was so easy because that area of the perimeter – on the direct route from the rally site – was only protected by five police officers. The FBI sends twice that many agents to arrest an unarmed old man like Roger Stone.)

2. A handful of men with a military / law enforcement demeanor seemed to be the ringleaders of the breach, yet none have been charged despite ample video evidence of their actions. Most are not even on the FBI 1/6 wanted list! The ringleaders seemed to have little interest in the actual rally and speeches, but were busy arranging the breach of the Capitol well before the rally and speeches had even ended.

3. The purpose of these unindicted men seems to have been twofold:

(1) to encourage (and assist, in some cases) unstable members of the crowd (e.g., “Antler Man”) in engaging in unlawful acts such as fighting with police and breaching the Capitol; and

(2) to herd as many ordinary, non-violent Trump supporters as possible into the Capitol and its immediate vicinity.

This was facilitated by removal of the barriers and the warning signs prior to the arrival of the crowd, who – by entering a restricted area without realizing it – unwittingly broke the law.

4. The purpose of herding in as many Trump supporters as possible was to reinforce the impression of a huge, violent mob (an “insurrection”) threatening our nation’s very existence.

Whereas the reality is that the number of people who actually engaged in violence and other overt crimes was probably limited to one or two hundred (if that) out of a crowd of 200,000 or more.

But the sight of the large crowds in and around the Capitol was essential for the “insurrection” narrative that was immediately put in place.

4. For “conspiracy theorists,” the question of Quo Bono (“Who benefits?”) is always paramount, and is believed to provide a clue as to who actually orchestrated a particular event.

In the case of January 6th, it is clear that the only people who have benefited are the DOJ, FBI and other enemies of Trump and the populist movement that he helped trigger.

(Summary edited from comment on the article by Stephen Triesch)